Current:Home > InvestParents will have to set aside some earnings for child influencers under new California laws -AssetTrainer
Parents will have to set aside some earnings for child influencers under new California laws
View
Date:2025-04-12 23:36:26
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — Parents in California who profit from social media posts featuring their children will be required to set aside some earnings for their minor influencers under a pair of measures signed Thursday by Gov. Gavin Newsom.
California led the nation nearly 80 years ago in setting ground rules to protect child performers from financial abuse, but those regulations needed updating, Newsom said. The existing law covers children working in movies and TV but doesn’t extend to minors making their names on platforms such as TikTok and Instagram.
Family-style vlogs, where influencers share details of their daily lives with countless strangers on the internet, have become a popular and lucrative way to earn money for many.
Besides coordinated dances and funny toddler comments, family vlogs nowadays may share intimate details of their children’s lives — grades, potty training, illnesses, misbehaviors, first periods — for strangers to view. Brand deals featuring the internet’s darlings can reap tens of thousands of dollars per video, but there have been minimal regulations for the “sharenthood” industry, which experts say can cause serious harm to children.
“A lot has changed since Hollywood’s early days, but here in California, our laser focus on protecting kids from exploitation remains the same,” he said in a statement. “In old Hollywood, child actors were exploited. In 2024, it’s now child influencers. Today, that modern exploitation ends through two new laws to protect young influencers on TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, and other social media platforms.”
The California laws protecting child social media influencers follow the first-in-the-nation legislation in Illinois that took effect this July. The California measures apply to all children under 18, while the Illinois law covers those under 16.
The California measures, which received overwhelming bipartisan support, require parents and guardians who monetize their children’s online presence to establish a trust for the starlets. Parents will have to keep records of how many minutes the children appear in their online content and how much money they earn from those posts, among other things.
The laws entitle child influencers to a percentage of earnings based on how often they appear on video blogs or online content that generates at least 10 cents per view. The children could sue their parents for failing to do so.
Children employed as content creators on platforms such as YouTube will also have at least 15% of their earnings deposited in a trust for when they turn 18. An existing state law has provided such protection to child actors since 1939 after a silent film-era child actor Jackie Coogan sued his parents for squandering his earnings.
The new laws will take effect next year.
The laws have the support from The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, or, SAG-AFTRA, and singer Demi Lovato, a former child star who has spoken publicly about child performers abuse.
“In order to build a better future for the next generation of child stars, we need to put protections in place for minors working in the digital space,” Lovato said in a statement. “I’m grateful to Governor Newsom for taking action with this update to the Coogan Law that will ensure children featured on social media are granted agency when they come of age and are properly compensated for the use of their name and likeness.”
The new laws protecting child influencers are part of ongoing efforts by Newsom to address the mental health impacts of social media on children. Newsom earlier this month also signed a bill to curb student phone access at schools and ban social media platforms from knowingly providing addictive feeds to children without parental consent.
veryGood! (995)
Related
- Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
- Women are paying big money to scream, smash sticks in the woods. It's called a rage ritual.
- Officials removed from North Carolina ‘eCourts’ lawsuit alleging unlawful arrests, jail time
- UC president recommends UCLA pay Cal Berkeley $10 million per year for 6 years
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- US utility pledges more transparency after lack of notice it empowered CEO to make plant decisions
- WWII pilot from Idaho accounted for 80 years after his P-38 Lightning was shot down
- How long does it take for a college degree to pay off? For many, it's 5 years or less.
- Questlove charts 50 years of SNL musical hits (and misses)
- The DAF Token Empowers the Dream of Ai Profit Algorithms 4.0
Ranking
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hi Hi!
- Arizona State University scholar on leave after confrontation with woman at pro-Israel rally
- How PLL's Sasha Pieterse Learned to Manage Her PCOS and Love Her Body Again
- Why am I lonely? Lack of social connections hurts Americans' mental health.
- Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
- A $400 pineapple? Del Monte brings rare Rubyglow pineapple to US market in limited numbers
- Bucks’ Patrick Beverley suspended 4 games without pay for actions in season-ending loss to Pacers
- See the 2024 Met Gala's best-dressed stars and biggest moments
Recommendation
South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
Utilities complete contentious land swap to clear way for power line in Mississippi River refuge
Oprah reveals new book club pick Long Island by Colm Tóibín: Read a free excerpt
Utah avalanche triggers search for 3 skiers in mountains outside of Salt Lake City
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
'Selling the OC' cast is torn apart by an alleged threesome. It's not that big of a deal.
How Hailey Bieber’s Rhode Has Transformed My Super Sensitive Skin
Officials removed from North Carolina ‘eCourts’ lawsuit alleging unlawful arrests, jail time