Current:Home > ContactTexas Supreme Court hears arguments to clarify abortion ban -AssetTrainer
Texas Supreme Court hears arguments to clarify abortion ban
View
Date:2025-04-23 13:45:40
Austin, Texas — A lawyer representing 20 women and two doctors argued before the all-Republican Texas Supreme Court on Tuesday that women have been denied lifesaving care under the state's strict abortion law as they seek to clarify what qualifies as a medical exception.
"We are just seeking clarification on what the law aims to do," said Molly Duane, a lawyer for the Center for Reproductive Rights, which brought the lawsuit.
Five women who were denied abortions under the state filed the lawsuit in March, and they were later joined by 17 other plaintiffs, including two doctors. The lawsuit, which was brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights, is believed to be the first to be brought by women who were denied abortions after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last year.
Unlike other legal challenges to abortion laws, this case does not seek to overturn Texas' ban but rather to clarify what qualifies as a medical exemption. But Supreme Court Justice Brett Busby said the job of the court is to "decide cases," and not to "elaborate and expand laws in order to make them easier to understand or enforce."
Beth Klusmann, a lawyer for the state, argued Tuesday that the women did not have the standing to sue, suggesting that the women should have instead sued their doctors for medical malpractice.
Duane argued on Tuesday that because the law is unclear, the women were denied lifesaving care, and that the state's interpretation means that "women would need to have blood or amniotic fluid dripping down their leg before they can come to court."
Earlier this year, a judge in Austin ruled that women who experience pregnancy complications are exempt from the state's abortion ban. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton appealed the ruling, bringing the legal challenge to the state Supreme Court.
In August, Travis County Judge Jessica Mangrum placed an injunction on the law, ruling that the plaintiffs faced "an imminent threat of irreparable harm under Texas's abortion bans. This injunction is necessary to preserve Plaintiffs' legal right to obtain or provide abortion care in Texas in connection with emergent medical conditions under the medical exception and the Texas Constitution."
The injunction was put on hold when Paxton appealed.
- In:
- Texas
- Abortion
veryGood! (27383)
Related
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- See How Jennifer Lopez, Khloe Kardashian and More Stars Are Celebrating 4th of July
- Taylor Swift Jokes About Apparent Stage Malfunction During The Eras Tour Concert
- Elon Musk threatens to reassign @NPR on Twitter to 'another company'
- Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
- In Nevada’s Senate Race, Energy Policy Is a Stark Divide Between Cortez Masto and Laxalt
- ‘Last Gasp for Coal’ Saw Illinois Plants Crank up Emission-Spewing Production Last Year
- In the Race for Pennsylvania’s Open U.S. Senate Seat, Candidates from Both Parties Support Fracking and Hardly Mention Climate Change
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- In ‘Silent Spring,’ Rachel Carson Described a Fictional, Bucolic Hamlet, Much Like Her Hometown. Now, There’s a Plastics Plant Under Construction 30 Miles Away
Ranking
- Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
- Natural Gas Samples Taken from Boston-Area Homes Contained Numerous Toxic Compounds, a New Harvard Study Finds
- Study Identifies Outdoor Air Pollution as the ‘Largest Existential Threat to Human and Planetary Health’
- Misery Wrought by Hurricane Ian Focuses Attention on Climate Records of Florida Candidates for Governor
- Finally, good retirement news! Southwest pilots' plan is a bright spot, experts say
- Robert De Niro's Grandson Leandro De Niro Rodriguez Dead at 19
- What has been driving inflation? Economists' thinking may have changed
- Fossil Fuels Aren’t Just Harming the Planet. They’re Making Us Sick
Recommendation
Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
Oil Industry Moves to Overturn Historic California Drilling Protection Law
Does Michael Jordan Approve of His Son Marcus Dating Larsa Pippen? He Says...
Q&A: The Activist Investor Who Shook Up the Board at ExxonMobil, on How—or if—it Changed the Company
NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
Our final thoughts on the influencer industry
Kyle Richards and Mauricio Umansky Break Up After 27 Years of Marriage
As the Biden Administration Eyes Wind Leases Off California’s Coast, the Port of Humboldt Sees Opportunity