Current:Home > MarketsFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -AssetTrainer
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-15 19:42:42
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (66)
Related
- A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
- A Los Angeles woman was arrested in Russia on charges of treason. Here’s what we know
- Hunter Biden files motions to dismiss tax charges against him in California
- Parts of a Martin Luther King Jr. memorial in Denver have been stolen
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- Restaurant worker is rewarded for hard work with a surprise visit from her Marine daughter
- Trial to determine if Texas school’s punishment of a Black student over his hair violates new law
- Audrii Cunningham case timeline: From her disappearance to suspect's arrest
- The Daily Money: Spending more on holiday travel?
- AT&T cellphone service out for tens of thousands across the country
Ranking
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Rescuers battle to save a baby elephant trapped in a well
- Stock market today: Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 surges to all time high, near 39,000
- Insulin prices were capped for millions. But many still struggle to afford to life-saving medication
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- What is chlormequat, and can the chemical found in foods like Quaker Oats and Cheerios impact fertility?
- Top NBA free agents for 2024: Some of biggest stars could be packing bags this offseason
- Jason Reitman and Hollywood’s most prominent directors buy beloved Village Theater in Los Angeles
Recommendation
'Most Whopper
Kentucky's second-half defensive collapse costly in one-point road loss to LSU
A Missouri woman was killed in 1989. Three men are now charged in the crime
Haley says embryos 'are babies,' siding with Alabama court ruling that could limit IVF
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
How to Watch the 2024 SAG Awards and E!'s Live From E! Red Carpet
Parts of a Martin Luther King Jr. memorial in Denver have been stolen
Gabby Petito’s Parents Reach Settlement With Brian Laundrie’s Family in Civil Lawsuit