Current:Home > reviewsWisconsin Supreme Court keeps ban on mobile absentee voting sites in place for now -AssetTrainer
Wisconsin Supreme Court keeps ban on mobile absentee voting sites in place for now
View
Date:2025-04-14 12:48:46
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin Supreme Court kept a lower court’s ruling banning the use of mobile voting sites in the upcoming presidential election in place for now, a win for Republicans.
However, in a victory for Democrats, the court also ensured late Tuesday that municipalities across the battleground state can use the same method in place since 2016 to determine where to locate early voting sites for the upcoming August primary and November presidential election.
They just can’t use mobile sites, like Racine did in 2022 when it allowed ballots to be cast in a van that traveled around the city.
The order came just ahead of Wednesday’s deadline for municipalities to designate alternate locations for voters to cast early, absentee ballots.
Wisconsin state law prohibits locating any early voting site in a place that gives an advantage to any political party. At issue in the current case is how to interpret that law.
The Racine County Circuit Court said in January that the mobile voting vans in Racine were not allowed under the law. Additionally, the van was placed in areas that were advantageous to Democrats, also in violation of the law, the court ruled.
The court said state law means that an advantage to a political party can only be avoided if voters in the immediate vicinity of the early voting location cast their ballots exactly the same as voters who live in the immediate vicinity of the municipal clerk’s office.
The Supreme Court put that interpretation on hold Tuesday.
“At this stage, just months before the August primary and November general elections, there is a risk that the circuit court’s ruling will disrupt ongoing preparations for those elections by creating uncertainty about which sites may be designated as alternate absentee balloting locations,” the court said in its 4-3 order supported by the liberal majority.
Justice Rebecca Bradley, one of the three dissenting conservative justices, said the order by the liberal majority was the latest in an “ongoing effort to resolve cases in a manner benefitting its preferred political party.”
Bradley said that putting a court’s interpretation of the law on hold is “without precedent, and for good reason — doing so is nonsensical.” She and the other two conservative justices agreed with the four liberal justices in keeping the court’s ban on mobile voting sites in place.
The underlying case proceeds in the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which is expected to schedule oral arguments in the fall, too late to affect absentee voting rules for this year’s elections.
While the case is proceeding, the elections commission asked the Supreme Court to put the earlier court ruling on hold in light of Wednesday’s deadline for selecting early voting sites.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday said there was little harm in granting a stay that would keep the same criteria in place for determining early voting locations that has been used since 2016. But it declined to lift the ban on mobile voting sites, a win for Republicans.
The van was first used in Racine’s municipal elections in 2022. It was purchased with grant money Racine received from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, the nonprofit funded by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
Wisconsin voters in April approved a constitutional amendment banning the use of private money to help run elections.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, on behalf of Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, brought the lawsuit after the state elections commission said use of the van in Racine did not break the law.
An attorney with WILL who handled the case was traveling Wednesday and had no immediate comment.
Racine officials, the Democratic National Committee and the Milwaukee-based voting advocacy group Black Leaders Organizing for Communities joined with the elections commission in defending the use of the van.
Representatives of those groups did not return messages Wednesday.
veryGood! (22174)
Related
- Average rate on 30
- Patrick Mahomes vs. Lamar Jackson with Super Bowl at stake. What else could you ask for?
- US sees signs of progress on deal to release hostages, bring temporary pause to Israel-Hamas war
- What's next for Bill Belichick as 2024 NFL head coaching vacancies dwindle?
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Crash involving multiple vehicles and injuries snarls traffic on Chesapeake Bay bridge in Maryland
- Tea with salt? American scientist's outrageous proposal leaves U.S.-U.K. relations in hot water, embassy says
- Nearly 25,000 tech workers were laid in the first weeks of 2024. What's going on?
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Texas attorney general refuses to grant federal agents full access to border park: Your request is hereby denied
Ranking
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Greta Thunberg joins hundreds marching in England to protest airport’s expansion for private planes
- Maine man dies after rescuing 4-year-old son when both fall through ice at pond
- Massachusetts man wins Keno game after guessing 9 numbers right
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- New Orleans thief steals 7 king cakes from bakery in a very Mardi Gras way
- Charges against country singer Chris Young in Nashville bar arrest have been dropped
- Greta Thunberg joins hundreds marching in England to protest airport’s expansion for private planes
Recommendation
Apple iOS 18.2: What to know about top features, including Genmoji, AI updates
U.S. women's figure skating at a crossroads amid Olympic medal drought of nearly 20 years
US sees signs of progress on deal to release hostages, bring temporary pause to Israel-Hamas war
Donald Trump is on the hook for $88.3 million in defamation damages. What happens next?
Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
South Carolina deputy fatally shoots man after disturbance call
Crash involving multiple vehicles and injuries snarls traffic on Chesapeake Bay bridge in Maryland
93 Americans died after cosmetic surgery in Dominican Republic over 14-year period, CDC says